Goal Zero and Jackery now compete much more closely than the old versions of this comparison suggested. Both brands sell LiFePO4 power stations with pure sine wave inverters, fast wall charging and long warranties—but the right winner changes with the size and job.
For the three model pairs in this update, my winners are the Goal Zero Yeti 300, Jackery Explorer 500 v2 and Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000. That gives Goal Zero two wins out of three, but it does not make Goal Zero the automatic choice for everyone. Jackery is usually easier to carry, and the HomePower 3600 Plus has meaningful UPS and home-backup advantages.
This comparison is based on current manufacturer specifications and manuals, not hands-on tests of the six products below. I kept my original Yeti 200X ownership experience in a separate legacy section so firsthand evidence is not confused with spec-based analysis.
Quick Results
- Best small power station: Goal Zero Yeti 300 — stronger battery longevity, faster input options, app control and IPX4 protection.
- Best around 500Wh: Jackery Explorer 500 v2 — lighter, longer-rated cycle life and a 10 ms UPS while matching the Yeti’s 500W output.
- Best large solar-first system: Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 — more base capacity and up to 3,000W of solar input.
- Best large essential-home-backup alternative: Jackery HomePower 3600 Plus — lighter, UPS-capable and expandable to roughly 21kWh.
- Overall brand result for these exact matchups: Goal Zero wins 2–1, but the use-case winner matters more than the score.
| Matchup | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Yeti 300 vs. Explorer 300 | Goal Zero Yeti 300 | LiFePO4, 4,000-cycle rating, 200W input, IPX4 and app control; Jackery is lighter. |
| Yeti 500 vs. Explorer 500 v2 | Jackery Explorer 500 v2 | Lower weight, 6,000-cycle claim and 10 ms UPS; Goal Zero has better weather and port features. |
| Yeti PRO 4000 vs. HomePower 3600 Plus | Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 | More base capacity and up to 3,000W solar; Jackery is lighter and more UPS/home-backup focused. |
How I Compared Goal Zero and Jackery
I compared capacity, usable output, battery chemistry and cycle life, weight, port selection, wall and solar input, weather protection, app support, expansion and home-backup integration. For a repeatable explanation of that process, see how Pure Power Solar evaluates products.
Capacity alone does not tell you how long a device will run. Inverter losses, standby draw, temperature and the appliance’s real wattage all matter. The portable power station runtime calculator is the fastest way to turn a watt-hour rating into a realistic estimate.
There are two important scope notes. First, the Explorer 300 in this matchup is the original 293Wh NMC model tied to the supplied Amazon link—not the newer Explorer 300 v2 or 300 Plus. Second, the Yeti PRO 4000 and HomePower 3600 Plus are comparable large systems, but their strongest features point to different buyers: Goal Zero leans harder into high-input solar and accessory integration, while Jackery leans into UPS behavior and modular home backup.
Goal Zero vs. Jackery: Key Brand Differences
Battery Chemistry and Cycle Life
Goal Zero’s current Yeti 300, Yeti 500 and Yeti PRO 4000 use LiFePO4 batteries rated for 4,000 cycles to 80% of original capacity. Jackery’s new Explorer 500 v2 and HomePower 3600 Plus also use LiFePO4, with published cycle-life claims of 6,000 cycles to at least 70% capacity. The original Explorer 300 is the outlier: it uses older lithium-ion NMC chemistry and is rated for about 800 cycles to 80%.
Those thresholds are not directly identical—80% and 70% are different end points—but they still show the generational gap. If you expect daily cycling for years, I would prioritize one of the LiFePO4 models.
Charging and Solar Input
Goal Zero has the clearest advantage at the top end. The Yeti PRO 4000 can accept up to 3,000W through its high-voltage solar input, versus 1,000W for the HomePower 3600 Plus. The smaller Yeti 300 and Yeti 500 each accept up to 200W of solar, which is competitive with the Explorer 500 v2 and far ahead of the original Explorer 300’s solar-only input.
Panel wattage is only one part of compatibility. Voltage, current, connector type and cold-weather open-circuit voltage must stay inside the station’s limits. Use the solar panel sizing for power stations guide before mixing third-party panels or building a series string.
Portability, Ports and Outdoor Use
Jackery generally wins on weight. The Explorer 300 is about half the weight of the Yeti 300, the Explorer 500 v2 is roughly 3.5 pounds lighter than the Yeti 500, and the HomePower 3600 Plus is substantially lighter than a Yeti PRO 4000 on its roll cart.
Goal Zero counters with broader DC and USB options, stronger solar input on the PRO model, app control across these three Yetis and published IPX4 water resistance. IPX4 is splash resistance, not permission to leave a power station in rain or expose ports to water.
Home Backup and Expansion
Both large systems can move beyond basic portable power. The Yeti PRO 4000 expands to about 20kWh with Tank PRO batteries and can integrate with Goal Zero’s Haven ecosystem. The HomePower 3600 Plus expands to about 21kWh from one base unit; pairing two units enables 240V output and a larger bank. Either home-circuit installation requires the correct transfer hardware and a qualified electrician where local code requires one.
Goal Zero Yeti 300 vs. Jackery Explorer 300
Winner: Goal Zero Yeti 300.
This is the least even pairing in the article because the products come from different battery generations. Their capacities and inverter ratings are close, but the Yeti 300’s LiFePO4 pack, 4,000-cycle rating, faster inputs, 100W USB-C, app control and IPX4 rating make it the better long-term buy. The Explorer 300’s major advantage is portability: at roughly 7 pounds, it is much easier to carry.
Specifications
| Specification | Goal Zero Yeti 300 | Jackery Explorer 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 296.96Wh | 293Wh |
| Battery chemistry | LiFePO4 | Lithium-ion NMC |
| Published cycle life | 4,000 cycles to 80% | 800 cycles to 80% |
| AC output | 350W continuous / 600W surge | 300W continuous / 500W surge |
| Weight | 13.7 lb | About 7.1 lb |
| Dimensions | 11.3 × 7.7 × 6.7 in | 9.1 × 5.2 × 7.8 in |
| USB / DC highlights | 100W USB-C PD, additional USB-C and USB-A, 12V car and 6mm DC | 60W USB-C PD, two USB-A and 12V car outlet |
| Maximum solar / DC input | 200W | 90W through DC input |
| Fastest published wall charging | As fast as 50 minutes in fast mode | About 2.5 hours using DC and USB-C together |
| Published solar recharge | About 2 hours with 200W input | About 5 hours with a 100W-class panel |
| App / weather | Goal Zero app; IPX4 | No app; no published IP rating |
| Warranty | 5 years | 2 years standard; extra coverage may depend on channel |
General Similarities and Differences
Both stations sit near 300Wh and use 300–350W pure sine wave inverters. Either one is appropriate for phones, laptops, cameras, lights, routers, small fans and many CPAP setups. Neither is the right tool for a space heater, kettle, hair dryer or other high-draw heating appliance.
The battery is the decisive difference. Goal Zero publishes 4,000 cycles to 80% for the Yeti 300, versus about 800 cycles to 80% for the original Explorer 300. That is a fivefold cycle-rating advantage on paper. The Yeti is also rated IPX4 and works with the Goal Zero app, while the original Explorer 300 has neither feature.
Ports and Charging
The Yeti 300 has the more modern port set: 100W USB-C Power Delivery, additional USB-C charging, USB-A, a regulated 12V car outlet and a 6mm DC output. Its 200W solar/DC input and 420W maximum AC fast-charge input give it much more charging headroom.
The Explorer 300 can combine its 90W DC input with the 60W USB-C PD port for up to 150W of total input. That is a clever way to cut charge time, but it requires two charging sources. The USB-C port tops out at 60W, and solar input through the DC port is lower than the Yeti’s.
Pros and Cons
| Model | Strengths | Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|
| Goal Zero Yeti 300 | LiFePO4; 4,000 cycles; 200W solar; 100W USB-C; IPX4; app | 13.7 lb; heavier than the Jackery; 350W inverter |
| Jackery Explorer 300 | About 7.1 lb; simple layout; dual-input charging; often discounted | Older NMC battery; 800 cycles; no app or IP rating; lower input power |
Final Thoughts
Choose the Yeti 300 if this will be a frequently cycled station, if you want app monitoring, or if you will use it around campsites and field work where splash resistance matters. Choose the Explorer 300 only if low weight and a steep discount matter more than battery longevity and newer charging hardware.
Check the Goal Zero Yeti 300 on Amazon. Check the Jackery Explorer 300 on Amazon.
Goal Zero Yeti 500 vs. Jackery Explorer 500 v2
Winner: Jackery Explorer 500 v2.
This is the closest matchup. Both use LiFePO4 batteries, both have 500W pure sine wave inverters with 1,000W surge ratings, both accept up to 200W of solar, and their capacities differ by only about 13Wh. The Jackery wins because it is lighter, has the longer published cycle-life claim and adds a 10 ms UPS function.
Specifications
| Specification | Goal Zero Yeti 500 | Jackery Explorer 500 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 499.2Wh | 512Wh |
| Battery chemistry | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Published cycle life | 4,000 cycles to 80% | 6,000 cycles to at least 70% |
| AC output | 500W continuous / 1,000W surge | 500W continuous / 1,000W surge |
| Weight | 16.1 lb | 12.57 lb |
| Dimensions | 11.32 × 7.82 × 7.8 in | 12.24 × 8.07 × 6.18 in |
| USB / DC highlights | 100W USB-C PD, two 30W USB-C, two USB-A, 12V car and 6mm DC | 100W USB-C, 30W USB-C, 18W USB-A and 12V car outlet |
| Maximum solar input | 200W | 200W |
| Published wall recharge | About 1.4 hours in fast mode | About 1.3 hours |
| Published solar recharge | About 2.8 hours at 200W input | About 2.8 hours under ideal 200W input |
| UPS function | No 10 ms UPS claim used in this comparison | 10 ms |
| App / weather | Goal Zero app; IPX4 | No app or published IP rating used in this comparison |
| Warranty | 5 years | 5 years total, subject to regional registration terms |
General Similarities and Differences
The 499.2Wh Yeti and 512Wh Jackery will deliver nearly the same real-world runtime. For planning purposes, a 50W load might run roughly 8 hours after allowing for conversion losses, while a 100W load may be closer to 4 hours. Use the runtime calculator with your actual load rather than treating the nameplate capacity as fully usable AC energy.
Jackery publishes a 6,000-cycle rating to at least 70% capacity. Goal Zero publishes 4,000 cycles to 80%. Because the thresholds differ, “6,000 is 50% better” would be too simplistic, but the Jackery rating is still excellent. It also weighs 12.6 pounds versus 16.1 pounds for the Yeti.
The Yeti remains the better outdoor-oriented unit. It has IPX4 protection, app connectivity and more varied USB/DC outputs. If you need Goal Zero accessories or want to monitor the station remotely, those advantages can outweigh Jackery’s portability win.
Ports and Charging
Both models provide 100W USB-C Power Delivery and 200W solar input. The Yeti offers more USB-C and DC connection choices, while the Explorer 500 v2 keeps the layout simpler with two AC outlets, USB-C, USB-A and a regulated car outlet.
Jackery publishes about 1.3 hours for a full wall recharge and about 2.8 hours under ideal 200W solar conditions. Goal Zero lists about 1.4 hours in fast AC mode and about 2.8 hours at its maximum solar input. In practice, solar conditions and panel temperature will stretch both estimates.
Pros and Cons
| Model | Strengths | Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|
| Goal Zero Yeti 500 | IPX4; app control; broader USB/DC selection; 5-year warranty | 16.1 lb; lower published cycle count; no 10 ms UPS claim |
| Jackery Explorer 500 v2 | 12.6 lb; 6,000-cycle claim; 10 ms UPS; fast charging | No published IP rating found; fewer output choices; U.S. availability needs verification |
Final Thoughts
For most buyers in this capacity class, I would pick the Explorer 500 v2. It is easier to carry, has UPS functionality and gives up almost nothing in output or runtime. I would choose the Yeti 500 instead for wet-weather caution, app monitoring, or a more flexible port mix.
Check the Goal Zero Yeti 500 on Amazon. See the Jackery Explorer 500 v2 on Amazon
Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 vs. Jackery HomePower 3600 Plus
Winner: Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 for a solar-first large power station.
The Yeti wins this head-to-head because it starts with about 410Wh more capacity and can accept up to 3,000W of high-voltage solar—three times Jackery’s 1,000W solar ceiling. Both deliver 3,600W of continuous 120V AC output, so the Goal Zero’s larger battery and faster potential solar recovery are more meaningful than a small inverter difference.
The HomePower 3600 Plus is the better home-backup specialist for many buyers. It is much lighter, supports sub-10 ms UPS switching, carries a 6,000-cycle claim and can be paired with a second unit for 240V. If the main goal is essential-circuit backup rather than aggressive off-grid solar harvesting, I would choose the Jackery despite giving the matchup win to Goal Zero.
Specifications
| Specification | Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 | Jackery HomePower 3600 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 3,993.6Wh | 3,584Wh |
| Battery chemistry | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Published cycle life | 4,000 cycles to 80% | 6,000 cycles to 70% |
| AC output | 3,600W continuous / 7,200W surge | 3,600W continuous / 7,200W surge |
| Weight | 115.7 lb bare; 125.7 lb with roll cart | About 77.2 lb |
| Dimensions | 21.4 × 13.8 × 14.8 in (without cart) | 15.2 × 12.2 × 19.3 in |
| AC / RV output | 120V inverter plus TT-30 RV output | 4 AC outlets plus TT-30 RV output |
| USB / DC highlights | 100W USB-C, two 30W USB-C, three USB-A, 12V aux, HPP and 6mm DC | Two 100W USB-C, two USB-A; AC-focused layout |
| Maximum solar input | Up to 3,000W high-voltage solar | Up to 1,000W solar |
| Maximum AC input | Up to 1,800W | Up to 1,800W |
| UPS function | No sub-10 ms UPS claim used in this comparison | Sub-10 ms switching for supported loads |
| Expansion | Up to about 20kWh with Tank PRO batteries | Up to about 21kWh; two units enable 240V |
| App | Goal Zero app via Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | Jackery app |
| Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
Capacity, Output and Runtime
The Yeti PRO 4000 stores 3,993.6Wh; the HomePower stores 3,584Wh. With similar conversion losses, that gives the Yeti roughly 11% more raw energy. Both 3,600W inverters can start and run many refrigerators, freezers, sump pumps, power tools and kitchen appliances, but whole-home expectations need care. A 3,600W station cannot run every heavy load at once, and 240V appliances need the appropriate Jackery dual-unit setup or properly designed Goal Zero home-integration equipment.
Solar Input, Expansion and Home Integration
The Yeti’s 3,000W high-voltage solar input is the standout spec. Under excellent sun with a properly sized array, that can dramatically shorten recovery after a long outage. Goal Zero also supports Tank PRO expansion to about 20kWh and integration with Haven transfer equipment.
The HomePower 3600 Plus accepts up to 1,000W of solar and expands to about 21kWh from one system. Two HomePower units can be linked for 240V output and an even larger bank. It also offers a fast UPS response for supported loads. These are meaningful advantages for refrigerators, networking gear and other equipment that should keep running through a grid interruption.
Portability and Ports
Jackery has the portability advantage at about 77 pounds, compared with about 116 pounds for the bare Yeti PRO 4000 and roughly 126 pounds with its roll cart. Both are wheeled systems rather than casual carry-in-one-hand products.
The HomePower includes four standard AC receptacles, a TT-30 RV outlet, two 100W USB-C ports and two USB-A ports. The Yeti emphasizes a wider ecosystem: high-power AC, TT-30, Power+ expansion/integration, multiple USB outputs, a 12V auxiliary outlet, an HPP output and 6mm DC ports.
Pros and Cons
| Model | Strengths | Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|
| Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 | 3,993.6Wh; up to 3,000W solar; broad DC and integration ecosystem | 115.7 lb bare; 4,000-cycle rating; large physical footprint |
| Jackery HomePower 3600 Plus | About 77.2 lb; sub-10 ms UPS; 6,000-cycle claim; dual-unit 240V path | 3,584Wh; 1,000W solar ceiling; 240V requires a second base unit |
Final Thoughts
Pick the Yeti PRO 4000 if you are building around a large solar array, want the slightly larger base battery or already use Goal Zero’s HPP and Haven ecosystem. Pick the HomePower 3600 Plus if mobility, UPS behavior, longer published cycle life or a path to dual-unit 240V backup matters more.
Check the Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 on Amazon. Check the Jackery HomePower 3600 Plus on Amazon.
Which One Should You Choose?
- Frequent camping and outdoor field use around 300Wh: Yeti 300.
- The lightest practical 500Wh option: Explorer 500 v2.
- Splash resistance and app control around 500Wh: Yeti 500.
- High-input off-grid solar or rapid solar recovery: Yeti PRO 4000.
- Essential home backup, UPS loads and future 240V expansion: HomePower 3600 Plus.
- A heavily discounted compact backup used only occasionally: the original Explorer 300 can still make sense, but its NMC battery and lower cycle rating are dated.
My Firsthand Experience With the Goal Zero Yeti 200X and Jackery Explorer 300
My Goal Zero Yeti 200X
I owned a Goal Zero Yeti 200X, and it worked well until I overloaded its AC output. I was drawing approximately 180W despite the inverter’s 120W continuous rating, which caused the AC port to fail. That was user error on my part, not a defect in the current model.
The takeaway that still holds: check continuous inverter output, not just surge output, before plugging in an appliance.
A power station can have enough battery capacity to sustain a device for a long time while still being unable to start or maintain it if the inverter itself is undersized.
If you want a closer look at the Yeti 200X, check out my review article and video overview.
My Jackery Explorer 300
I’ve had a much smoother experience with the Jackery Explorer 300. At 7.1 lbs, it’s genuinely light enough to toss in a backpack, and that’s the main reason I keep reaching for it over bulkier stations. In testing, its 300W AC ports hit their rated continuous output without issue, and combining AC and USB-C charging got it from empty to full in about 2.5 hours — the fastest charging method I tried. On a 100W solar panel, it peaked at 88W and took 4-5 hours to fully recharge.
For real-world use, it ran a 50″ TV for over 3 hours and handled more than 4 full laptop charges before running out. My complaints are minor: the LCD display is small and can be hard to read in bright light, and the car port cover isn’t marine-grade, so I’m careful with it outdoors. Cycle life is average compared to newer LiFePO4 competitors, but for its weight and price, it’s held up well.
I scored it 7/10 in my full Jackery Explorer 300 review — it’s the pick if lightweight and compact matter most to you, though the EcoFlow River 600 offers more features if you don’t mind carrying an extra 4 lbs.
Solar Panels – Goal Zero vs. Jackery
Jackery and Goal Zero take different approaches to solar. Jackery’s SolarSaga panels are bifacial, IP68-rated and built to be light. Goal Zero’s Nomad panels are soft-sided foldables designed around its own Yeti connectors (8mm and High Power Port). I paired the panels from each company that are closest in wattage and purpose.
As with the power stations above, this comparison is based on current manufacturer specifications and list prices, not hands-on testing.
See the winners of each matchup below:
| Solar Panels Compared | Winner | What Makes It Better? | Check Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jackery SolarSaga 40W Air vs. Goal Zero Nomad 50+ | Jackery SolarSaga 40W Air | – About 60% lighter (1.98 lbs vs. 5.03 lbs) – About $140 cheaper – IP68 rating and USB-C + USB-A ports | Amazon |
| Jackery SolarSaga 100W Air vs. Goal Zero Nomad 100 | Jackery SolarSaga 100W Air | – About 30% lighter (7.05 lbs vs. 10.2 lbs) – About $150 cheaper – USB-A and USB-C ports; the Nomad 100 has only an 8mm output | Amazon |
| Jackery SolarSaga 200 vs. Goal Zero Nomad 200 | Jackery SolarSaga 200 | – About 35% lighter (14.33 lbs vs. 22 lbs) – About $220 cheaper – IP68 rating and a longer warranty (3+2 years vs. 2 years) | Amazon |
Jackery’s SolarSaga panels win all three matchups because they are lighter, cheaper and IP68-rated. Goal Zero’s Nomad panels still make sense if you own a Yeti and want a panel with the matching connector, or if you want the extra 10W of the Nomad 50+ over Jackery’s 40W panel.
One thing to check before you buy: the two brands use different connectors and voltage ranges. The SolarSaga 100 Air is rated at 29.7V open-circuit voltage, while Goal Zero’s 8mm solar inputs list a 14–22V range, and Jackery says the 100 Air is not compatible with the Explorer 300 series. Match the panel to your power station, and use my solar panel sizing guide for power stations before mixing brands.
Goal Zero Nomad vs. Boulder Solar Panels
Goal Zero’s Nomad panels are the lightweight, foldable option, and its Boulder panels are the rigid, mountable option. For example, the Nomad 50+ weighs 5.03 lbs, while the Boulder 50 weighs 12.4 lbs.
Nomad panels are soft-sided and fold into themselves, which makes them easy to pack and carry. Most of them include a USB-A port, so you can charge a phone or power bank straight from the panel. Goal Zero notes that the larger Nomads sit inside a fabric enclosure that wears faster if you leave them outside permanently.
Boulder panels use an anodized aluminum frame and tempered glass, so they hold up better to weather and long-term use. The Boulder 50 and 100 can be mounted with Goal Zero’s bracket kit on a van, RV roof or building, and the Briefcase versions (100W and 200W) fold on a hinge and come with a canvas bag and kickstand. The Boulder panels I compare in this article have a single 8mm or High Power Port output and no USB, so you need a power station connected before they do anything.
Boulder panels used to be the budget choice, but that gap has mostly closed. At 50W, the Boulder 50 and Nomad 50+ both list at $249.95, and at 200W the Boulder 200 Briefcase and Nomad 200 both list at $599.95. The exception is the Boulder 100 at $299.95 versus $399.95 for the Nomad 100 and Boulder 100 Briefcase, although Goal Zero currently shows the Boulder 100 as sold out.
For a closer look at the smallest pair, see my Goal Zero Nomad 50 vs Boulder 50 comparison. You can also browse Goal Zero’s full solar panel lineup.
Jackery SolarSaga 40W Air vs. Goal Zero Nomad 50+
Winner: Jackery SolarSaga 40W Air.
This is the closest of the three matchups. The Nomad 50+ has 10 more watts (50W vs. 40W), but the SolarSaga 40W Air weighs less than half as much (1.98 lbs vs. 5.03 lbs) and costs about $140 less.
Specifications
| Specification | Jackery SolarSaga 40W Air | Goal Zero Nomad 50+ |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 40W | 50W |
| Ports | USB-A, USB-C, DC8020 output | 8mm (1), USB-A (1) |
| Weight | 1.98 lbs (0.9 kg) | 5.03 lbs (2.28 kg) |
| Folded size | Book-sized | 14.6 x 9.1 x 2 in |
| Weather rating | IP68 | None published |
| Warranty | 1 year + 2 extended (Jackery.com) | 2 years |
| Price (subject to change) | $109 | $249.95 |
| Additional features | Bifacial cells, four mounting holes, carabiners, storage bag | Listed recharge time: Yeti 300 in 7+ hours, Yeti 500 in 11+ hours |
Similarities & Differences
Both panels fold small enough to travel with and are best for phones, lights, power banks and small power stations. Neither is a fast way to fill a large battery.
The SolarSaga’s weight is the biggest difference. At 1.98 lbs, it is one of the few panels in this article that is practical to carry on a hike, and it has four mounting holes and two carabiners for hanging it from a pack or tent. It also has both USB-A and USB-C, while the Nomad 50+ has only USB-A. Its IP68 rating is another advantage, but keep the DC connector end out of the wet, since Jackery says those ports are not waterproof.
The Nomad 50+ counters with 25% more rated power and an 8mm output that plugs into Yeti power stations. Goal Zero says its four-panel redesign is 26% lighter than the original Nomad 50, but at 5.03 lbs it is still much heavier than the Jackery. Jackery’s bifacial cells can pick up extra light from the back side, but I would plan around the 10W rating gap rather than count on it disappearing.
Final Thoughts
For most backpackers and campers, the SolarSaga 40W Air is the better buy: it is much lighter, less than half the price and IP68-rated. Choose the Nomad 50+ if you own a Yeti 300 or 500 and want the matching 8mm connection with more wattage.
Jackery SolarSaga 100W Air vs. Goal Zero Nomad 100
Winner: Jackery SolarSaga 100W Air.
Both are foldable 100W panels for camping and power stations, but the SolarSaga 100W Air weighs 7.05 lbs versus 10.2 lbs for the Nomad 100, costs about $150 less and adds USB-A and USB-C ports. Goal Zero lists the Nomad 100 as sold out, and its newer Nomad 100+ (8.38 lbs, USB-A added, $399.95) was also showing as sold out when I checked. Even against the 100+, the Jackery is about 16% lighter and $150 cheaper.
Specifications
| Specification | Jackery SolarSaga 100W Air | Goal Zero Nomad 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 100W (110W with bifacial gain) | 100W |
| Ports | DC8020 output, USB-A, USB-C | 8mm (1) |
| Weight | 7.05 lbs | 10.2 lbs |
| Dimensions (folded) | 17.05 x 16.65 x 1.85 in | 20.5 x 15.5 x 2 in |
| Dimensions (unfolded) | 65.67 x 16.65 x 0.67 in | 20.5 x 59.5 x 1 in |
| Open circuit voltage | 29.7V | 21.5V |
| Weather rating | IP68 | None published |
| Warranty | 1 year + 2 extended (Jackery.com) | 2 years |
| Price (subject to change) | $249 | $399.95 |
| Additional features | Built-in aluminum stand with stake holes, 9.84 ft cable, storage bag | 6 ft 8mm cable |
Similarities & Differences
Both panels are 100W monocrystalline-style foldables aimed at car camping, RV stops and recharging a power station. Both are too large to be backpacking panels, so think of them as campsite gear.
The SolarSaga has a slightly smaller folded footprint but is longer when unfolded (65.67 in vs. 59.5 in). It also stands on its own with an integrated aluminum stand, while the Nomad 100 has no kickstand. With USB-A and USB-C on the panel, you can charge devices directly. The Nomad 100 has only its 8mm output, so it does nothing without a power station or power bank connected.
The Nomad 100 is still the panel Goal Zero designed for its own stations. Goal Zero pairs the newer 100+ with the Yeti 500 (6+ hours) and Yeti 700 (8+ hours), so it makes more sense than the Jackery if you already own one of those.
Final Thoughts
If you own a Jackery station, or you are buying a panel to charge devices directly, the SolarSaga 100W Air is the better choice: lighter, cheaper and easier to set up. Choose Goal Zero’s Nomad 100 line only if you need a panel that plugs straight into a Yeti’s 8mm input.
Jackery SolarSaga 200 vs. Goal Zero Nomad 200
Winner: Jackery SolarSaga 200.
This is the biggest gap of the three. The SolarSaga 200 weighs 14.33 lbs versus 22 lbs for the Nomad 200, costs about $220 less, and folds smaller and thinner. The Nomad 200 has built-in legs and a High Power Port for large Yetis, but the SolarSaga wins on weight, price, weather rating and warranty.
Specifications
| Specification | Jackery SolarSaga 200 | Goal Zero Nomad 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Rated power | 200W (225W with bifacial gain) | 200W |
| Ports | DC8020 output, USB-A, USB-C | High Power Port (1), USB-A (1) |
| Weight | 14.33 lbs | 22 lbs |
| Dimensions (folded) | 23.62 x 23.50 x 1.57 in | 28.2 x 22.3 x 2.0 in |
| Dimensions (unfolded) | 89.76 x 23.50 x 0.98 in | 28.2 x 100.7 x 1.0 in |
| Open circuit voltage | 22V | 23.0V |
| Weather rating | IP68 | None published |
| Warranty | 3 years + 2 extended (Jackery.com) | 2 years |
| Price (subject to change) | $379 | $599.95 |
| Additional features | Adjustable stands, SolarTarget sun-angle guide, 3 m cable | Built-in legs with stake-down loops, hanging loops, mesh pouch, 6 ft HPP cable |
Similarities & Differences
Both panels are 200W foldables with similar open-circuit voltages, and both are sized for mid-size and large power stations rather than backpacking. The SolarSaga 200 is smaller in every dimension, saving about 8 lbs, and is IP68-rated, while Goal Zero lists no water rating for the Nomad 200 and notes that its fabric enclosure wears faster if the panel lives outdoors.
The Nomad 200 has the better setup hardware: legs with stake-down loops and hanging loops. Some Jackery buyers report that the SolarSaga’s stands are not very supportive in the middle of the panel, and that it rarely reaches a full 200W, which is normal for any panel outside of ideal lab conditions.
Connector fit is the other factor. The Nomad 200 uses Goal Zero’s High Power Port and is listed as a pairing for the Yeti 1500 and Yeti PRO 4000. The SolarSaga 200 is built for Jackery stations.
Final Thoughts
For most buyers, the SolarSaga 200 is the better panel: it is lighter, easier to store and $220 cheaper. Choose the Nomad 200 if you own a large Yeti and want a panel that connects through its High Power Port without adapters.
Panels I Didn’t Compare: Where Each Company Is Headed
The three matchups above cover the most similar panels, but both companies sell others that show where their lineups are going.
Goal Zero
- Nomad 5, 10 and 20 ($59.95, $99.95, $149.95): small USB panels with a built-in Flip power bank dock, aimed at backpackers charging phones and power banks.
- Boulder 100 Briefcase and Boulder 200 Briefcase ($399.95 and $599.95): rigid tempered-glass panels in a hinged, carryable case.
- Boulder 100i and Flex 100i ($199.95 and $149.95): a rigid mountable panel and a flexible IP67 panel for vans, RVs and curved surfaces. Both need an MC4-to-HPP adapter to plug directly into a Yeti, and both were listed as sold out when I checked.
- Ranger 300 Briefcase ($799.95): a 300W foldable made of four 75W panels with an aluminum frame, kickstand and carry case. Goal Zero positions it between the Nomad and Boulder.
- Nomad 400 ($999.95): a 400W folding panel, currently sold out on Goal Zero’s site.
Direction: Goal Zero covers the widest range, from 5W pocket panels to 400W foldables and permanent mounts. It is building toward higher wattage (the Ranger 300 and multi-panel bundles for its large Yetis) and lighter, more efficient Nomads (the Nomad 50+ and 100+ redesigns).
Jackery
- SolarSaga 100 Prime (100W): a rigid tempered-glass panel with an aluminum frame and Z-bracket mounting for RV roofs, vans and sheds, rated up to 25% efficiency.
- SolarSaga 100 Light (100W): a 4.52 lb flexible panel that bends up to 221° for curved surfaces like RV roofs and balconies.
- SolarSaga 500X (500W): a large bifacial add-on panel designed for the Explorer 5000 Plus.
Direction: Jackery has fewer panels, but they are all bifacial and IP68-rated. It is moving from portable foldables into mounted, flexible and higher-wattage panels to go with its home-backup stations.
Goal Zero vs. Jackery Solar Panels – Which Is Overall Better?
Jackery’s SolarSaga panels are the better choice in all three matchups I compared. They are lighter, cheaper at list price, IP68-rated, and the smaller models add USB-C and USB-A ports for direct charging.
Goal Zero’s strengths are connector fit and range. If you own a Yeti, the Nomad panels plug straight into its 8mm and High Power Port inputs, and Goal Zero also sells rigid Boulder, Ranger and mountable panels that Jackery does not match at every size.
- Backpacking or ultralight trips: Jackery SolarSaga 40W Air.
- Car camping with a Jackery station: Jackery SolarSaga 100W Air.
- 200W for a mid-size or large station: Jackery SolarSaga 200, or the Nomad 200 if you own a large Yeti.
- Permanent or semi-permanent mounting: Goal Zero Boulder, or the Jackery SolarSaga 100 Prime.
- Curved surfaces like vans and balconies: Jackery SolarSaga 100 Light or Goal Zero Flex 100i.
Goal Zero vs. Jackery: Overall Verdict
Goal Zero wins two of the three power station comparisons. The Yeti 300 is the more durable and capable small station, and the Yeti PRO 4000 is the better large solar-first platform. Jackery wins the middle matchup because the Explorer 500 v2 is lighter, UPS-capable and exceptionally long-lived on paper while matching the Yeti 500’s output.
On solar panels, Jackery sweeps all three matchups. The SolarSaga Air panels are lighter, cheaper and IP68-rated at every wattage I compared, from the 40W Air against the Nomad 50+ up through the SolarSaga 200 against the Nomad 200. Goal Zero’s advantage is connector fit and range: if you already own a Yeti, its Nomad and Boulder panels plug straight in, and Goal Zero covers sizes — from 5W pocket panels to 400W foldables and rigid mounts — that Jackery doesn’t fully match.
At brand level, I would choose Goal Zero for outdoor use, flexible DC/USB connectivity and high-input solar with a station to match. I would choose Jackery when lower weight, UPS functionality, modular essential-home-backup features, or a lighter and cheaper solar panel are the priority.
If neither lineup feels right, compare BLUETTI vs. Jackery, BLUETTI vs. Goal Zero and EcoFlow vs. Jackery before buying.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Goal Zero better than Jackery?
Not across every size. Goal Zero wins the Yeti 300 and Yeti PRO 4000 matchups in this guide, while Jackery wins the Explorer 500 v2 matchup. Choose the exact model around your load, charging plan and portability needs.
Do Goal Zero and Jackery use LiFePO4 batteries?
The current Yeti 300, Yeti 500, Yeti PRO 4000, Explorer 500 v2 and HomePower 3600 Plus do. The original Explorer 300 compared here uses older NMC chemistry, which is why its published cycle life is much lower.
Which brand charges faster from solar?
It depends on the model. The Yeti 300 and Yeti 500 each accept up to 200W, similar to the Explorer 500 v2. The Yeti PRO 4000 is the clear large-system winner with up to 3,000W of solar input versus 1,000W for the HomePower 3600 Plus.
Can I use third-party solar panels?
Usually, yes, if voltage, current, polarity and connector requirements match. An adapter does not make an electrically incompatible panel safe. Check the current manual and calculate the array’s cold-weather open-circuit voltage.
Can these power stations back up a house?
The small and midsize models are best for individual devices or a small group of essentials. The Yeti PRO 4000 and HomePower 3600 Plus can support essential home circuits with compatible transfer equipment. Installation, grounding and permitted electrical work should follow the manufacturer’s instructions and local code.
Is the original Jackery Explorer 300 still worth buying?
It can be a good lightweight occasional-use station at a strong discount. For frequent cycling, I would pay more for a LiFePO4 model because the original Explorer 300’s roughly 800-cycle rating is far below the newer alternatives.
Source and Method Note
Specifications were checked against current Goal Zero and Jackery product pages, available manufacturer manuals and current U.S. product listings on September 27, 2026. Published charge times assume ideal conditions and can vary with temperature, battery state, panel output and charging mode. Prices and availability were intentionally omitted because they change frequently.
Primary product sources: Goal Zero Yeti 300 specifications; Goal Zero Yeti 500 specifications; Goal Zero Yeti PRO 4000 specifications; Jackery Explorer 300 specifications; Jackery Explorer 500 v2 specifications; Jackery HomePower 3600 Plus specifications.
Last update on 2026-10-10 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API